Evaluasi Farmakologi Menggunakan Model Uji In vitro, In vivo, dan Ex vivo
Keywords:
pharmacologycal, evaluation, in vivo, in vitro, Ex vivoAbstract
Modern pharmacology increasingly adopts an integrative approach to drug evaluation, examining not only dose-response relationships but also biological dynamics and interactions with molecular targets. This review assesses the strengths and weaknesses of in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo models used in pharmacological testing. A systematic literature search was performed using PMC, NCBI, Google Scholar, and Elsevier databases, focusing on publications from 2020 to 2025. Out of 15 identified articles, 11 original studies met the inclusion criteria, while reviews, case reports, and studies lacking clear methodology were excluded.
Findings show that in vitro models offer high efficiency, precise variable control, and insight into molecular mechanisms but lack the complexity of whole-organism physiology. Ex vivo models better preserve tissue structure and function, enhancing translational relevance, though limited tissue availability and short viability pose challenges. In contrast, in vivo models provide the most comprehensive data on systemic effects, pharmacokinetics, and safety but face ethical constraints and higher costs. No single model is sufficient alone; combining all three approaches improves the predictive accuracy of preclinical studies and supports successful clinical applications.
References
Bi, H., Feng, T., Li, B. & Han, Y. 2020. In vitro and In vivo Comparison Study of Electrospun PLA and PLA/PVA/SA Fiber Membranes for Wound Healing. Polymers. 12(4):839.
Fayez, N., Khalil, W., Abdel-Sattar, E. & Abdel-Fattah, A.F.M. 2023. In vitro and in vivo assessment of the anti-inflammatory activity of olive leaf extract in rats. Inflammopharmacology. 31(3):1529.
Felix, L.O., Mishra, B., Khader, R., Ganesan, N. & Mylonakis, E. 2022. In vitro and In vivo Bactericidal and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Alpha Mangostin Against Staphylococcus aureus Persister Cells. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12:898794.
Hasna, B., Houari, H., Koula, D., Marina, S., Emilia, U. & Assia, B. 2023. In vitro and In vivo Study of Combined Effect of Some Algerian Medicinal Plants and Probiotics against Helicobacter pylori. Microorganisms. 11(5):1242.
Hui, X., Yu, X., Huang, K., Xu, T., Cao, L., … Jin, M. 2022. In vitro and in vivo effects of 3-indoleacetonitrile—A potential new broad-spectrum therapeutic agent for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antiviral Research. 209:105465.
Hussain, F., Hafeez, J., Khalifa, A.S., Naeem, M., Ali, T. & Eed, E.M. 2022. In vitro and in vivo study of inhibitory potentials of α-glucosidase and acetylcholinesterase and biochemical profiling of M. charantia in alloxan-induced diabetic rat models. American Journal of Translational Research. 14(6):3824. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274573/ Date of access: 03 Nov. 2025.
Kondic, A., Bottino, D., Harrold, J., Kearns, J.D., Musante, C.J., … Schoeberl, B. 2022. Navigating Between Right, Wrong, and Relevant: The Use of Mathematical Modeling in Preclinical Decision Making. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 13:860881.
Lorenz, K., Preem, L., Sagor, K., Putrinš, M., Tenson, T. & Kogermann, K. 2023. Development of In vitro and Ex vivo Biofilm Models for the Assessment of Antibacterial Fibrous Electrospun Wound Dressings. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 20(2):1230.
Merkel, E.A., Worley, B., Christensen, R.E., Harikumar, V., Lu, K.Q., … Alam, M. 2022. In vitro and Ex vivo Investigation of Intralesional Sodium Thiosulfate as a Reversal Agent for Calcium Hydroxylapatite Soft Tissue Filler. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 142(11):3125.
Pasqualetti, V., Locato, V., Fanali, C., Mulinacci, N., Cimini, S., … De Gara, L. 2021. Comparison between in vitro chemical and ex vivo biological assays to evaluate antioxidant capacity of botanical extracts. Antioxidants. 10(7):1136.
Sadozai, S.K., Khan, S.A., Baseer, A., Ullah, R., Zeb, A. & Schneider, M. 2022. In vitro, Ex vivo, and In vivo Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Based Topical Formulation Against Candida albicans Infection. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 13:909851.
Sahu, N., Alam, P., Ali, A., Kumar, N., Tyagi, R., … Saxena, S. 2024. Optimization, In vitro and Ex vivo Assessment of Nanotransferosome Gels Infused with a Methanolic Extract of Solanum xanthocarpum for the Topical Treatment of Psoriasis. Gels. 10(2):119.
Soufizadeh, P., Mansouri, V. & Ahmadbeigi, N. 2024. A review of animal models utilized in preclinical studies of approved gene therapy products: trends and insights. Laboratory Animal Research. 40(1):17.
Wang, L., Hu, D., Xu, J., Hu, J. & Wang, Y. 2024. Complex in vitro model: A transformative model in drug development and precision medicine. Clinical and Translational Science. 17(2):e13695.
Wang, X., Lu, J., Huang, Y., Liu, X., Fang, G., … Guo, Z. 2024. Editorial: Emerging bioanalytical techniques and therapies for human disease models. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 12:1453813.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juwita Agnimaya Maharani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial purposes.
- Adaptation — mixing, changing, and developing materials for any purpose, even commercial ones.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.






